<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2nd Ricohforum Meetup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/2nd-ricohforum-meetup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/2nd-ricohforum-meetup/</link>
	<description>The news, article and review page from Ricoh GR-Diary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cristiansorega</title>
		<link>http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/2nd-ricohforum-meetup/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>cristiansorega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/?p=672#comment-839</guid>
		<description>Richard, I believe if Ricoh is to introduce a interchangeable lens camera it would be to replace both the GRD and the GX series. They could release a GR lens and a GX lens for it and could focus only on improving one body instead of two. Since they only update these models every two years it would make it easier to focus on improvements for only one camera.

Mark, glad you enjoyed it and I surely enjoyed our discussion towards the end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, I believe if Ricoh is to introduce a interchangeable lens camera it would be to replace both the GRD and the GX series. They could release a GR lens and a GX lens for it and could focus only on improving one body instead of two. Since they only update these models every two years it would make it easier to focus on improvements for only one camera.</p>
<p>Mark, glad you enjoyed it and I surely enjoyed our discussion towards the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/2nd-ricohforum-meetup/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/?p=672#comment-836</guid>
		<description>A very worthwhile event and I enjoyed it!

Nice pic of me! :) :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very worthwhile event and I enjoyed it!</p>
<p>Nice pic of me! :) :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/06/11/2nd-ricohforum-meetup/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/?p=672#comment-835</guid>
		<description>No replacement for GX200 is the key news here indicating the rumour of an interchangeable lens model may be true! What would be the point of a GX300 if they produce a G-interchangeable lens camera which could replace both GRD and GX from a photo-taking point of view? Not quite as pocketable without separating lens and body so you make a greater case for the GRD continuing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No replacement for GX200 is the key news here indicating the rumour of an interchangeable lens model may be true! What would be the point of a GX300 if they produce a G-interchangeable lens camera which could replace both GRD and GX from a photo-taking point of view? Not quite as pocketable without separating lens and body so you make a greater case for the GRD continuing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
