<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review Diary: Ricoh CX1 &#8211; First Impression</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/05/03/review-diary-ricoh-cx1-day-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/05/03/review-diary-ricoh-cx1-day-2/</link>
	<description>The news, article and review page from Ricoh GR-Diary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cristiansorega</title>
		<link>http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/05/03/review-diary-ricoh-cx1-day-2/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>cristiansorega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 08:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/?p=654#comment-831</guid>
		<description>The CX1 is certainly a great camera and at low ISO the JPGs are very good and not any worse than the GRD II but if you use RAW then the GRD II will be better and it also has a faster lens with more contrast and sharper.

HDR is indeed best done on a computer but having the feature in-camera is nice and saves on postprocessing time and effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CX1 is certainly a great camera and at low ISO the JPGs are very good and not any worse than the GRD II but if you use RAW then the GRD II will be better and it also has a faster lens with more contrast and sharper.</p>
<p>HDR is indeed best done on a computer but having the feature in-camera is nice and saves on postprocessing time and effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freek Bom</title>
		<link>http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/05/03/review-diary-ricoh-cx1-day-2/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Freek Bom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 15:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/?p=654#comment-828</guid>
		<description>Will the Ricoh CX1 gives beter results as the Rich GR digital II. I read in some fotographic magazines that HDR is better be done in an application like Photoshop than so called &quot;in-camera&quot; during a photo shoot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the Ricoh CX1 gives beter results as the Rich GR digital II. I read in some fotographic magazines that HDR is better be done in an application like Photoshop than so called &#8220;in-camera&#8221; during a photo shoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristian</title>
		<link>http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/05/03/review-diary-ricoh-cx1-day-2/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 07:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/?p=654#comment-827</guid>
		<description>Thanks Nevin! 
I was not aware they put my review up already since it is not yet finished, thanks for the info on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nevin!<br />
I was not aware they put my review up already since it is not yet finished, thanks for the info on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nevin</title>
		<link>http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/05/03/review-diary-ricoh-cx1-day-2/#comment-826</link>
		<dc:creator>Nevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 14:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/?p=654#comment-826</guid>
		<description>Well done, Cristi! Your review is listed by dphotojournel, in case you&#039;re not aware of it.

(On the contrary, I read manual at least twice before really starting to use a new cmaera.  Well, just different approaches to take great photos)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, Cristi! Your review is listed by dphotojournel, in case you&#8217;re not aware of it.</p>
<p>(On the contrary, I read manual at least twice before really starting to use a new cmaera.  Well, just different approaches to take great photos)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
