<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ricoh R10 Review &#8211; Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/01/07/ricoh-r10-review-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/01/07/ricoh-r10-review-part-1/</link>
	<description>The news, article and review page from Ricoh GR-Diary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:29:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cristiansorega</title>
		<link>http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/01/07/ricoh-r10-review-part-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>cristiansorega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 08:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/?p=473#comment-722</guid>
		<description>Thanks James!
While the R10 is a great little camera, I would say for street photography it is limited. The lens is not very fast so you have to watch your shutterspeed or boost the ISO. It can complement your GRD nicely for times when you need zoom but I would not really use it for street photography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks James!<br />
While the R10 is a great little camera, I would say for street photography it is limited. The lens is not very fast so you have to watch your shutterspeed or boost the ISO. It can complement your GRD nicely for times when you need zoom but I would not really use it for street photography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/01/07/ricoh-r10-review-part-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/?p=473#comment-721</guid>
		<description>Great review Cristi!  :) Do you think this would be a good street camera?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review Cristi!  :) Do you think this would be a good street camera?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cristiansorega</title>
		<link>http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/01/07/ricoh-r10-review-part-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>cristiansorega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/?p=473#comment-719</guid>
		<description>The R10 is much more solid so should not have the problems with the lens assembly as previous R series cameras. So far it has been working without problems and I haven&#039;t read about any problems with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The R10 is much more solid so should not have the problems with the lens assembly as previous R series cameras. So far it has been working without problems and I haven&#8217;t read about any problems with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecksteing</title>
		<link>http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/2009/01/07/ricoh-r10-review-part-1/#comment-716</link>
		<dc:creator>ecksteing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ricohgrdiary.wordpress.com/?p=473#comment-716</guid>
		<description>As long as the R10 is reliable (the R6 and R7 were very unreliable and often needed repair) then this is likely a good camera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as the R10 is reliable (the R6 and R7 were very unreliable and often needed repair) then this is likely a good camera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
